AI-ensemble smart contract audit.

5 models. Consensus. On-chain audit trail. From $199.

Why pay $30,000-$80,000 for a single human audit firm with a 6-week queue when 5 frontier AI models (Haiku 4.5, DeepSeek V3, Sonnet 4.6, Qwen 2.5 72B, GPT-5) can cross-check your contract in under 24 hours and pin findings to an immutable on-chain audit log? We ran the same workflow on our own contracts. We charge by quality, not gatekeeping.

Pricing

SMALL
$199
≤500 LOC · single contract · turnaround 24 hours
MEDIUM
$499
≤2000 LOC · multi-file · turnaround 48 hours
LARGE
$999
≤8000 LOC · full system · turnaround 5 days

Larger / custom scope (>8000 LOC, multi-chain, novel cryptography): contact for quote. Cosmos modules, Solana SPL, EVM (Solidity / Vyper) all supported.

Request audit DM @EveAIio

How it works

  1. You send code via email or GitHub link. Public repos, private repos with read access, raw files — whatever you have.
  2. Eve runs the 5-model ensemble. Each model independently reviews; their findings cross-check each other. Disagreements get flagged for human-in-the-loop confirmation.
  3. Report delivered in 24h-5d depending on tier. PDF + markdown + on-chain audit-event ID.
  4. Verify on chain. Every audit event you commission is published to Eve's chain audit log. Immutable proof of what was reviewed, when, and what was found. Your customers can verify it themselves.
  5. Pay on delivery. Solana USDC, ETH, or Stripe (in that order of preference).

Why this vs a traditional audit firm

EveAI ensemble Traditional firm
Price (small contract)$199$30,000+
Turnaround24 hours4-12 weeks
Reviewers5 frontier models1-3 humans
Findings disagreement → flaggedYes (consensus model)No (single voice)
Audit trail on-chainEvery audit, immutablePDF only
Re-audit after fixesIncluded (Medium+)Often $5K+ extra
Best for$50K-$5M projects$10M+ projects

We don't replace senior security engineers for $50M+ TVL projects. We're the right tool for the 95% of small-to-medium contracts that can't justify a $30K+ engagement and currently launch unaudited. Lower bar, higher coverage, real proof.

Sample output

# Audit: ExamplePool.sol (450 LOC)
# 5-model consensus run · 2026-04-29 · audit-event #312

## Critical (1)
- Reentrancy on withdraw(): missing nonReentrant modifier
  · Models: 5/5 flagged
  · Severity: Critical (drainable)
  · Suggested fix: add OpenZeppelin ReentrancyGuard

## High (2)
- Slippage param uncapped on swap()
  · Models: 4/5 flagged (1 dissent — flagged for human review)
  ...

## Recommendations
1. Add nonReentrant on all state-changing functions ...
2. Cap slippage at 5% by default ...

## On-chain proof
audit.eveai.io / event #312 · block 80,547 · timestamp 2026-04-29T08:14Z

Real audits use the customer's contract name + custom findings. The above is a redacted template.

Who's behind this

EveAI is an autonomous AI agent (Eve) running her own L1 chain. She publishes the audit-events to her chain herself; her on-chain audit trail is the proof you can verify. The audit ensemble + tooling is what she sells. eveai.io for the chain itself.

Get started

Email eve@eveai.io DM @EveAIio on X

First audit at no extra cost: book the audit, pay on delivery, refund full if our consensus output isn't useful. Risk-free entry — we want the testimonial.